Institutional Collaboration

Macaw Publications welcomes responsible scholarly collaboration with universities, research institutions, academic societies, professional associations, research centres, laboratories, libraries, and other legitimate organisations engaged in research, education, and scholarly communication.

Institutional collaboration is intended to strengthen research communication, scholarly participation, editorial development, academic visibility, research integrity, and responsible knowledge dissemination while preserving the independence of editorial and peer-review decisions.

 
Scholarly Partnership  •  Research Integrity  •  Editorial Independence  •  Mutual Academic Value
01
COLLABORATION PURPOSE

Building Responsible Scholarly Partnerships

The purpose of institutional collaboration is to support meaningful academic cooperation that contributes to research quality, knowledge dissemination, scholarly communication, professional development, and responsible publishing practice.

Collaboration should be based on clearly defined academic objectives, transparent responsibilities, mutual professional respect, and activities that provide genuine value to the scholarly community.

Institutional relationships should not be established merely for promotional association, artificial prestige, fabricated international representation, or misleading claims concerning journal quality or indexing.

02
ELIGIBLE ORGANISATIONS

Who May Collaborate with Macaw Publications?

01

Universities

Recognised universities and higher-education institutions engaged in teaching, research, and scholarly communication.

02

Research Institutions

Public, private, or independent research organisations conducting legitimate scientific, technical, medical, social, or interdisciplinary research.

03

Academic Societies

Scholarly associations and professional societies representing recognised academic disciplines or research communities.

04

Research Centres & Laboratories

Research centres, laboratories, innovation groups, and specialised academic units with established scholarly activities.

05

Libraries & Knowledge Centres

Academic libraries and knowledge organisations supporting research discovery, scholarly access, metadata, preservation, and research communication.

06

Professional Organisations

Legitimate professional bodies and scholarly organisations whose activities align with academic, scientific, or research objectives.

03
COLLABORATION AREAS

Potential Areas of Institutional Cooperation

Collaborative activities may be considered where they are academically appropriate, operationally feasible, and consistent with the policies of Macaw Publications and the participating institution.

01

Scholarly publishing and responsible research communication.

02

Research dissemination and academic knowledge-sharing initiatives.

03

Editorial and peer-review capacity development.

04

Research-integrity and publication-ethics awareness.

05

Academic workshops, seminars, webinars, and scholarly training activities.

06

Journal-development and scholarly communication initiatives.

07

Research metadata, discoverability, and scholarly infrastructure awareness.

08

Responsible Open Access and copyright-awareness activities.

09

Academic society and research-community engagement.

10

Other legitimate scholarly initiatives agreed by the participating organisations.

04
RESEARCH COMMUNICATION

Research Dissemination

Institutions may explore initiatives that support responsible dissemination of scholarly research to appropriate academic audiences.

Such activities may include scholarly communication awareness, research-publication workshops, author education, responsible Open Access practices, metadata awareness, and other academic initiatives.

Research dissemination activities must not compromise manuscript evaluation or create an expectation that institution-affiliated authors will receive preferential editorial treatment.

05
ACADEMIC DEVELOPMENT

Research & Scholarly Publishing Awareness

Where appropriate, institutional collaboration may include scholarly awareness activities for researchers, faculty members, doctoral scholars, early-career researchers, and other academic participants.

Relevant themes may include manuscript preparation, peer-review principles, publication ethics, responsible authorship, research integrity, plagiarism awareness, publication metadata, Open Access, copyright, data practices, and post-publication responsibilities.

Educational activities should be designed to improve responsible scholarly practice and should not promise publication acceptance or database indexing.

06
PEER REVIEW DEVELOPMENT

Reviewer & Editorial Capacity Building

Academic institutions may engage in activities that improve awareness of responsible peer review, reviewer ethics, editorial independence, constructive scholarly assessment, conflicts of interest, confidentiality, and research integrity.

Participation in such activities does not automatically appoint an individual as a reviewer or Editorial Board member of a Macaw Publications journal.

Reviewer and editorial appointments remain subject to the applicable qualification, expertise, verification, independence, and journal-selection procedures.

07
SCHOLARLY ENGAGEMENT

Academic Events & Knowledge Exchange

Institutional collaboration may include appropriately designed seminars, webinars, lectures, workshops, panel discussions, research symposia, and other scholarly knowledge-exchange activities.

The academic purpose, participating organisations, responsibilities, speakers, branding, sponsorship, and any financial arrangements should be communicated accurately.

Participation in a collaborative academic event does not imply automatic publication of presented research in a Macaw Publications journal.

08
CONFERENCES & PROCEEDINGS

Conference-Related Collaboration

Macaw Publications may consider legitimate collaboration relating to academic conferences, research meetings, or scholarly events where the subject, organising body, editorial process, and publication arrangements are appropriate.

Any publication arrangement for conference-derived manuscripts should be clearly defined in advance and should not be presented as automatic journal publication.

Where conference papers are considered for journal publication, the applicable journal should require appropriate manuscript development, editorial assessment, peer review, originality, disclosure of prior dissemination, and compliance with its publication policies.

09
SPECIAL COLLECTIONS

Special Issues & Thematic Collections

Institutions, academic societies, or qualified research groups may propose academically relevant special issues or thematic collections to an appropriate Macaw Publications journal.

Approval depends on relevance to the journal's aims and scope, scholarly merit of the proposed theme, qualifications and conflicts of interest of proposed Guest Editors, and the journal's editorial capacity.

Institutional collaboration or sponsorship does not guarantee acceptance of a special-issue proposal or of manuscripts submitted to an approved collection.

Permanent journal leadership retains appropriate oversight, and manuscripts remain subject to the applicable editorial, peer-review, ethics, and integrity requirements.

10
CORE PRINCIPLE

Editorial Independence Is Non-Negotiable

Institutional collaboration must remain separate from editorial decision-making.

A collaborating institution, sponsor, society, conference, research centre, or other organisation must not determine whether an individual manuscript is accepted or rejected.

Manuscript decisions should remain based on scholarly merit, relevance, methodological quality, research integrity, peer-review evidence, and the applicable journal policies.

Institutional prestige, financial support, partnership status, sponsorship, or author affiliation must not provide preferential treatment.

11
PUBLICATION INDEPENDENCE

No Guaranteed Publication

Institutional collaboration does not guarantee publication of manuscripts submitted by employees, faculty members, students, researchers, members, delegates, or affiliates of the collaborating organisation.

Manuscripts submitted to a Macaw Publications journal remain subject to the journal's normal editorial screening, peer-review process, publication ethics, conflicts-of-interest requirements, and final editorial decision.

No partnership agreement should promise predetermined acceptance of scholarly articles.

12
INDEXING TRANSPARENCY

No Guarantee of Database Indexing

Institutional collaboration does not guarantee current or future inclusion of a journal, article, conference, institution, or research output in Scopus, Web of Science, DOAJ, or another external indexing, abstracting, or discovery service.

External indexing organisations determine their own selection, coverage, and continuing-evaluation decisions independently.

Collaborating organisations should not use a Macaw Publications relationship to make unsupported indexing, accreditation, certification, ranking, or endorsement claims.

13
RESEARCH INTEGRITY

Responsible Scholarly Conduct

Institutional collaborations should promote responsible authorship, ethical research, reliable reporting, appropriate peer review, transparent conflicts of interest, responsible citation, and respect for the scholarly record.

Collaboration must not be used to facilitate paper mills, purchased authorship, fabricated peer review, citation manipulation, duplicate publication, false affiliations, fabricated data, or other forms of research or publication misconduct.

Credible integrity concerns arising within a collaborative activity may be referred to the appropriate journal, institution, publisher, or other responsible body for assessment.

14
AUTHORSHIP INTEGRITY

No Institutional or Honorary Authorship

Institutional collaboration does not justify adding individuals as authors solely because they hold administrative, supervisory, funding, partnership, or organisational positions.

Authorship should reflect genuine scholarly contribution in accordance with the applicable journal's authorship and publication-ethics requirements.

Institutional position or participation in a collaborative agreement must not be used to require inappropriate authorship.

15
AFFILIATION ACCURACY

Institutional Affiliations Must Be Genuine

Institutional affiliations appearing in articles, journal records, event materials, and collaborative communications should accurately represent genuine professional or academic relationships.

Collaboration with Macaw Publications must not be used to create fabricated affiliations, artificial internationalisation, or misleading institutional associations.

16
IDENTITY & BRANDING

Responsible Use of Names and Logos

The name, logo, journal identity, trademarks, or other visual assets of Macaw Publications should not be used in connection with an institutional activity without appropriate authorisation where such permission is required.

Likewise, Macaw Publications should use the name or logo of a collaborating institution only within the scope of the agreed relationship.

Branding should accurately describe the nature of the relationship and must not imply ownership, accreditation, endorsement, indexing, certification, or a broader partnership than has actually been established.

17
PUBLIC COMMUNICATION

Accurate Representation of Collaboration

Public announcements concerning institutional collaboration should describe the participating organisations, purpose, and nature of the relationship accurately.

Expressions such as “partner university”, “official institutional partner”, “academic partner”, or similar descriptions should be used only where the corresponding relationship has actually been established and the wording is appropriate.

A proposed, exploratory, or informal discussion should not be represented publicly as a completed institutional partnership.

18
DUE DILIGENCE

Verification Before Collaboration

Before entering a formal collaboration, Macaw Publications may review information concerning the identity, legal or academic status, authorised representatives, activities, reputation, research profile, and proposed objectives of the institution or organisation.

The collaborating organisation may likewise verify Macaw Publications and the relevant journal before proceeding.

Additional documentation or clarification may be requested where necessary to establish the legitimacy, authority, and feasibility of a proposed collaboration.

19
FORMAL ARRANGEMENTS

Written Collaboration Agreements

Where a collaboration involves continuing responsibilities, financial commitments, intellectual property, publication services, branding, events, data, or other material obligations, an appropriate written agreement may be required.

The agreement should identify the purpose, scope, authorised representatives, responsibilities, duration, financial arrangements where applicable, intellectual-property matters, confidentiality requirements, communication procedures, and termination conditions.

No individual should enter into a commitment on behalf of an organisation unless appropriately authorised to do so.

20
FINANCIAL TRANSPARENCY

Charges, Sponsorship and Financial Arrangements

Any financial arrangement associated with institutional collaboration should be documented clearly and separated from editorial decision-making.

Sponsorship, institutional support, event funding, service charges, or other legitimate payments must not purchase manuscript acceptance, favourable peer review, citation, editorial appointments, or indexing claims.

Journal-specific Article Processing Charges or no-fee policies remain governed by the applicable journal's published terms unless an authorised arrangement explicitly and transparently provides otherwise.

21
COMPETING INTERESTS

Disclosure of Conflicts

Individuals and organisations participating in collaborative activities should disclose relevant financial, institutional, academic, commercial, professional, or personal interests that could materially influence the activity.

Where a conflict affects editorial handling, peer review, or publication decisions, the matter should be managed through an appropriately independent process.

22
CONFIDENTIALITY

Protection of Confidential Information

Confidential information shared as part of a legitimate collaboration should be handled according to the agreed purpose and applicable legal, ethical, contractual, and professional requirements.

Institutional collaboration does not authorise access to confidential peer-review reports, unpublished manuscripts, editorial deliberations, personal data, or other protected information unless such access is specifically required and appropriately authorised.

23
DATA RESPONSIBILITY

Data, Privacy and Responsible Information Sharing

Collaborative activities involving personal, research, administrative, or technical data should define the purpose and appropriate handling of that information.

Data sharing should be limited to information necessary for the legitimate collaborative activity and should respect applicable confidentiality, privacy, ethics, consent, and institutional requirements.

24
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Copyright, Ownership and Permissions

Intellectual-property ownership and permissions should be addressed where collaborative activities involve copyrighted materials, educational resources, publications, datasets, software, graphics, recordings, trademarks, or other protected content.

Institutional collaboration does not automatically transfer copyright, trademark ownership, publication rights, or other intellectual-property rights between the participating organisations.

25
SOCIETY COLLABORATION

Academic & Professional Societies

Macaw Publications may consider appropriate collaboration with academic and professional societies where the relationship supports legitimate scholarly objectives.

A society relationship may involve academic advice, community engagement, scholarly events, editorial development, or other agreed activities.

Any role of a society in journal ownership, governance, sponsorship, editorial appointments, or publishing operations should be communicated accurately where applicable.

26
LIBRARY ENGAGEMENT

Libraries & Research Discovery

Macaw Publications welcomes appropriate engagement with academic and research libraries concerning scholarly access, journal information, metadata, discovery, repositories, persistent identifiers, preservation awareness, and research communication.

Library collaboration should support legitimate access and discoverability without creating misleading claims of selective indexing or institutional endorsement.

27
GLOBAL ENGAGEMENT

International Institutional Collaboration

Macaw Publications welcomes legitimate opportunities for scholarly collaboration with institutions and organisations from different countries and research communities.

International collaboration should arise from meaningful academic objectives and genuine participation rather than from attempts to manufacture geographic diversity for journal evaluation or promotional purposes.

Institutional affiliations and participating organisations should always be represented accurately.

28
PROPOSAL ASSESSMENT

How Collaboration Proposals Are Evaluated

01

Legitimacy and academic standing of the organisation.

02

Relevance of the proposed collaboration to scholarly publishing or research communication.

03

Academic value and expected scholarly outcomes.

04

Compatibility with publication ethics and research-integrity principles.

05

Protection of editorial independence.

06

Qualifications and authority of proposed representatives.

07

Operational feasibility and available resources.

08

Financial transparency where relevant.

09

Appropriate use of institutional names and branding.

10

Potential conflicts of interest or reputational risks.

29
PROPOSAL INFORMATION

Information to Include in a Collaboration Proposal

Organisations interested in institutional collaboration should provide sufficient information to enable an initial academic and administrative assessment.

01

Full official name of the institution or organisation.

02

Institution type and country.

03

Official institutional website.

04

Name, designation, and official contact details of the authorised representative.

05

Brief institutional or organisational profile.

06

Proposed area and purpose of collaboration.

07

Expected scholarly or institutional outcomes.

08

Proposed duration or timeline, where applicable.

09

Proposed responsibilities of each organisation.

10

Proposed financial, sponsorship, or resource arrangements, where applicable.

11

Any proposed use of journal or publisher branding.

12

Any other information necessary to evaluate the proposal.

30
COLLABORATION PROCESS

How to Propose Institutional Collaboration

Send an Institutional Collaboration Proposal

Authorised representatives of institutions or scholarly organisations interested in exploring collaboration with Macaw Publications may submit a brief proposal by email.

The proposal should explain the organisation, proposed collaboration, academic purpose, expected outcomes, responsible representatives, and any operational or financial arrangements relevant to the proposal.

Recommended Email Subject:

Institutional Collaboration Proposal – [Institution / Organisation Name] – [Country]
31
IMPORTANT NOTICE

Submission of a Proposal Does Not Create a Partnership

Submission, discussion, or preliminary evaluation of a collaboration proposal does not by itself create a formal partnership, memorandum of understanding, contractual relationship, endorsement, or other institutional commitment.

A collaboration should be treated as formally established only after the relevant organisations have completed any required evaluation, approval, documentation, and authorisation procedures.

32
COLLABORATIVE RESPONSIBILITY

Responsibilities of Participating Organisations

Macaw Publications

Supports transparent publishing arrangements, scholarly communication, research integrity, and appropriate publisher-level activities within the agreed collaboration.

Collaborating Institution

Provides accurate institutional information, appropriately authorised representatives, and fulfils the responsibilities agreed for the collaboration.

Journal Editors

Preserve editorial independence and apply the journal's scholarly, ethical, and peer-review standards without inappropriate institutional influence.

Participating Researchers

Remain responsible for authorship, research integrity, ethical conduct, accurate reporting, and compliance with the relevant journal policies.

33
COLLABORATION CONTINUITY

Review, Renewal and Termination

Formal collaborations may be reviewed periodically according to their purpose, duration, performance, scholarly value, and applicable agreement.

A collaboration may be revised, renewed, suspended, or discontinued where appropriate, including where objectives have been completed, circumstances have materially changed, agreed responsibilities are not fulfilled, or significant integrity, legal, financial, or reputational concerns arise.

Ending a collaboration should not alter the scholarly status or publication record of articles that have already been published legitimately.

34
RELATED FRAMEWORK

Institutional Collaboration Within Scholarly Publishing

Institutional collaboration should be considered together with the wider Macaw Publications publishing framework, including:

Governance & Management; Global Engagement & Partnerships; Publication Ethics & Research Integrity; Editorial Independence & Conflict of Interest; Peer Review & Editorial Process; Special Issues & Guest Editor Policy; Transparency & Business Practices; and Open Access, Copyright & Licensing.

Institutional collaboration with Macaw Publications does not by itself imply accreditation, certification, indexing, endorsement, ownership, institutional affiliation, or preferential editorial treatment beyond the specific relationship that has been formally established.
35
COLLABORATION CONTACT

Submit an Institutional Collaboration Proposal

Macaw Publications

Universities, research institutions, academic societies, professional organisations, libraries, and other legitimate scholarly organisations interested in exploring institutional collaboration may contact:

Email: publisher@macawpublications.com

Phone: +91 81211 28950

Macaw Publications
H.No. 4-123/8/172, Road No. 1, Indraprastha Colony,
Hathiguda, Hayath Nagar, Hyderabad,
Telangana, India - 501505

Recommended Email Subject:
Institutional Collaboration Proposal – [Institution / Organisation Name] – [Country]
INSTITUTIONAL COLLABORATION

Collaborate Responsibly. Strengthen Research. Advance Scholarly Communication.

Macaw Publications welcomes meaningful institutional relationships that support research, academic engagement, responsible scholarly communication, and the dissemination of knowledge. Collaborative activities should remain transparent, academically justified, and consistent with editorial independence, publication ethics, research integrity, and the interests of the wider scholarly community.

Institutions interested in exploring collaboration may submit a proposal to publisher@macawpublications.com .

Collaboration  •  Scholarship  •  Independence  •  Integrity